For every item click in the scoring box that most closely represents how you feel about the Mid-Term Evaluation Meeting (MTE). Where foreseen, you can comment briefly on each item about your reasons for giving this score, particularly requested if your ratings are 3, 2 or 1.
How you feel about the Mid Term Meeting?
The mid-term evaluation meeting programme
The mid-term evaluation of the ED.HO.C. project at personal level
The mid-term evaluation of the ED.HO.C. project at organisational level
The agenda of the partnership for the Experimentation (activities planned)
The working methods adopted for the Experimentation phase
The ED.HO.C. follow-up: new projects to be developed by the partnership
To what extent did you feel to have contributed to the decision making process inside the MTE group?
The role and tasks of my organization in the project
Your involvement in the ED.HO.C. project until now
The involvement of your local focus group in the ED.HO.C. project until now
The exchanges and learning during the Study Visits
The content of the Quality Chart at this moment in the project
Your learning within the ED.HO.C. project until now
The support and cooperation within the partnership until now
The decision making process within the partnership/in ED.HO.C. project until now
Concerning the Grundtvig Learning Partnership dimension
Concerning the ED.HO.C. Experimentation phase
Concerning your role in the Experimentation phase
Concerning the valorisation of the ED.HO.C. project and Quality Chart
To what extent did you feel you tackled the preparation of the MTE?
As professional, to what extent did you feel you have learned from the MTE?
How do you rate the lodging?
How do you rate the working rooms?
How do you rate the board (breakfasts, refreshments, meals, etc)?
How did you feel about the length of the meeting?
What is your overall rating of this meeting?